Interpreting the probabilities in Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism

While much has been written about the probabilities referenced in Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, insufficient attention paid to question of how these are be interpreted. In this paper, I demonstrate that objective interpretations entail denial traditional theism, making them unsuitable for purpose here. With respect epistemic interpretations, note standard Bayesianism is too permissive purposes. then argue use Principle Indifference at odds with his Reformed Epistemology. conclude some suggestions defenders argument might proceed.